You just finished interviewing three people for the same role. You’ve got three pages of scrawled notes, one gut feeling, and zero idea who’s actually the best fit. Here’s the fix: paste your notes into Claude and get a weighted scorecard with a clear recommendation in about a minute.
Sound familiar?
You scribbled notes during each interview. “Good communicator.” “Seemed nervous but smart.” “Seven years experience, but light on the tool we use.”
Now it’s decision time, and comparing candidates side by side feels like comparing apples to a vague feeling.
The 60-second fix
1. Gather your raw notes
Copy your messy notes for each candidate — bullet points, half-sentences, typos are fine.
2. Paste this prompt into Claude
I'm evaluating job candidates for a [role title] position.
Here are my raw, unedited interview notes for each candidate.
Please:
1. Pull out the key criteria that matter for this role (skills, experience, communication, culture fit, etc.)
2. Build a weighted scoring table (1-5 scale) comparing all candidates on those criteria
3. Give a short recommendation summary with your top pick and why
4. Flag any red flags or missing information I should follow up on
Notes:
[paste your raw interview notes here, labeled by candidate name]

3. Review, don’t rubber-stamp
Read the scorecard and check it against your gut. Use it to structure the conversation with your team, not replace your judgment.
Real example

Input (raw notes):
Candidate A: 5 yrs experience, strong SQL, mentioned she led a small team once, a bit quiet in the interview, seemed prepared, asked good questions about our roadmap.
Candidate B: 3 yrs experience, very confident, no team lead experience, said “I’m a fast learner” three times, didn’t ask any questions, strong portfolio though.
Claude’s output:
| Criteria (Weight) | Candidate A | Candidate B |
|---|---|---|
| Technical Skill (30%) | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| Leadership Potential (25%) | 4/5 | 2/5 |
| Communication (20%) | 3/5 | 4/5 |
| Curiosity/Engagement (15%) | 5/5 | 2/5 |
| Experience Level (10%) | 4/5 | 3/5 |
Recommendation: Candidate A leads with a weighted score of 3.9/5 vs. Candidate B’s 3.1/5, mainly driven by leadership experience and engagement during the interview. Follow-up needed: Neither set of notes mentions salary expectations or availability — worth confirming before making an offer.
Level up
- Paste notes for 4-5 candidates at once and ask for a ranked shortlist instead of a full table.
- Add your own weights: “Weight culture fit at 40% since this is a small team role.”
- Ask Claude to turn the scorecard into a one-paragraph summary you can paste into an email to your hiring manager.
FAQ
Can AI actually make a fair hiring decision matrix?
It organizes your own observations into a structured format — it doesn’t replace your judgment. Always review the output and add context AI can’t see, like references or gut instinct.
What if my notes are really messy or incomplete?
That’s fine — Claude will flag gaps and missing info rather than guessing. Use those flags as your follow-up question list.
Is this good for structured interview feedback across a whole hiring team?
Yes — ask everyone to paste their notes in the same format, then combine them in one prompt for a single unified scorecard.
Today’s check-in
Try it on your next round of interview notes and reply in the comments with how close the AI’s pick matched your gut call. Tomorrow: rewriting your own skills as impact-focused resume accomplishments — so you look as sharp as the scorecard you just built.
You might also like:
- Can I use AI as a proofreader or fact-checker for my own stuff?
- Visla — Turn a Written Script Into a Ready-to-Post Video



